Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Country/Region as subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Nature ; 616(7955): 104-112, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36813964

ABSTRACT

Blue foods, sourced in aquatic environments, are important for the economies, livelihoods, nutritional security and cultures of people in many nations. They are often nutrient rich1, generate lower emissions and impacts on land and water than many terrestrial meats2, and contribute to the health3, wellbeing and livelihoods of many rural communities4. The Blue Food Assessment recently evaluated nutritional, environmental, economic and justice dimensions of blue foods globally. Here we integrate these findings and translate them into four policy objectives to help realize the contributions that blue foods can make to national food systems around the world: ensuring supplies of critical nutrients, providing healthy alternatives to terrestrial meat, reducing dietary environmental footprints and safeguarding blue food contributions to nutrition, just economies and livelihoods under a changing climate. To account for how context-specific environmental, socio-economic and cultural aspects affect this contribution, we assess the relevance of each policy objective for individual countries, and examine associated co-benefits and trade-offs at national and international scales. We find that in many African and South American nations, facilitating consumption of culturally relevant blue food, especially among nutritionally vulnerable population segments, could address vitamin B12 and omega-3 deficiencies. Meanwhile, in many global North nations, cardiovascular disease rates and large greenhouse gas footprints from ruminant meat intake could be lowered through moderate consumption of seafood with low environmental impact. The analytical framework we provide also identifies countries with high future risk, for whom climate adaptation of blue food systems will be particularly important. Overall the framework helps decision makers to assess the blue food policy objectives most relevant to their geographies, and to compare and contrast the benefits and trade-offs associated with pursuing these objectives.


Subject(s)
Aquatic Organisms , Food Security , Internationality , Seafood , Sustainable Development , Humans , Diet/methods , Diet/statistics & numerical data , Diet/trends , Environment , Meat , Nutritional Status , Internationality/legislation & jurisprudence , Seafood/economics , Seafood/statistics & numerical data , Seafood/supply & distribution , Sustainable Development/economics , Sustainable Development/legislation & jurisprudence , Sustainable Development/trends , Food Security/economics , Food Security/legislation & jurisprudence , Food Security/methods , Climate Change , Health Policy , Environmental Policy , Socioeconomic Factors , Cultural Characteristics , Fatty Acids, Omega-3 , Carbon Footprint , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology
2.
Cien Saude Colet ; 25(12): 4945-4956, 2020 Dec.
Article in Portuguese, English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33295513

ABSTRACT

The Covid-19 pandemic revealed a concrete and immediate threat to food and nutrition security (FNS), especially for vulnerable groups. This study aimed to identify government strategies implemented in Brazil to provide the Human Right to Adequate and Healthy Food in high social vulnerability contexts during the Covid-19 pandemic. A cross-sectional study was carried out, with analysis of official documents published between March 20 and July 30, 2020, by the Federal Government, Federal District, Brazilian states, and capitals, focusing on measures to ensure availability and physical or financial access to food. Strategies implemented mainly involve food distribution and minimum income assurance. The following were implemented: Basic Emergency Income (Federal Government); Food Acquisition Program (PAA), and emergency financial aid (states); emergency food donation programs (states and municipalities). Existing measures were adapted to the pandemic, such as the National School Food Program (PNAE), the National Food Acquisition Program (PAA), and the distribution of food and staple food baskets. While essential, these strategies have limited scope and are insufficient to ensure FNS.


A pandemia de Covid-19 revelou a existência de ameaça concreta e imediata à segurança alimentar e nutricional (SAN), em especial de grupos vulnerabilizados. O estudo buscou identificar as estratégias governamentais implementadas no Brasil para prover o Direito Humano à Alimentação Adequada e Saudável em contextos de elevada vulnerabilidade social frente à Covid-19. Foi realizado um estudo transversal, com análise de documentos oficiais publicados entre 20 de março e 30 de julho de 2020 pela União, Distrito Federal, estados e capitais brasileiras, com foco em medidas que assegurem disponibilidade e acesso físico ou financeiro a alimentos. As estratégias implementadas envolvem fundamentalmente distribuição de alimentos e garantia de renda mínima. Foram instituídas: Renda Básica Emergencial (União); Programa de Aquisição de Alimentos (PAA) e auxílio financeiro emergencial (estados); programas de doação emergencial de alimentos (estados e municípios). Medidas existentes foram adaptadas frente à pandemia, como o Programa Nacional de Alimentação Escolar (PNAE), o Programa de Aquisição de Alimentos (PAA) nacional, a distribuição de alimentos e de cestas básicas. Embora importantes, essas estratégias têm alcance limitado e são insuficientes para assegurar a SAN.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Food Supply/legislation & jurisprudence , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Brazil/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diet, Healthy , Emergencies , Financing, Government/legislation & jurisprudence , Food Assistance/legislation & jurisprudence , Food Assistance/organization & administration , Food Insecurity , Food Security/economics , Food Security/legislation & jurisprudence , Food Security/methods , Food Supply/economics , Food Supply/methods , Government Regulation , Humans , Income , National Health Programs/legislation & jurisprudence , National Health Programs/organization & administration , Poverty Areas
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL